Short Pour & Factory Error Figures

Page 7 of 7 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Short Pour & Factory Error Figures - Page 7 Empty Re: Short Pour & Factory Error Figures

Post by Commander Clint Sun Nov 20, 2016 3:33 pm

welcome Banton989

That's a fantastic run of factory error Iggy's. cheers
Commander Clint
Commander Clint
Jedi Shogun Spirit

Posts : 10522
Join date : 2015-02-23
Yavin Honor : 26785
Age : 54
Location : Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Focus : Canadian Items & cardbacks, loose variants

Back to top Go down

Short Pour & Factory Error Figures - Page 7 Empty Re: Short Pour & Factory Error Figures

Post by the89thchris Thu Nov 24, 2016 3:04 am

When it comes to stuff like the hammerhead with no paint on the eyes and the R5 without the red stripe on the legs, any concern that those are not legitimate factory errors?
the89thchris
the89thchris
Tatooine Taisho

Posts : 2326
Join date : 2016-11-12
Yavin Honor : 5170
Age : 35
Location : Toronto, Ontario
Focus : Complete loose Kenner figures & a few MOC's.

https://www.instagram.com/thechrisporteous/

Back to top Go down

Short Pour & Factory Error Figures - Page 7 Empty Re: Short Pour & Factory Error Figures

Post by ourchickenshack Thu Nov 24, 2016 5:51 am

Yes there should always be concern on whether missing paint is a true error . Unless a figure is still sealed on a factory card or in a unopened baggie there is really no way to know for sure . It could be playwear or removed on purpose . Alex summed it up really well in this post from earlier in the thread :


General Kahn wrote:Great thread Chris75 , great idea. Nice to see all these errors under one roof. I've always been a fan of errors, just because they are interesting figures to have, but there is a dark side to them the same as there is with everything these days  Neutral  Here are a few from my collection.

Paint Errors

Probably the most common error that turns up is paint errors, usually the lack of a specific application.

[600][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][/600]
Luke Bespins with unpainted holster - Unpainted buckle - No eyes - Unpainted left hip

[300][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][/300]
Boba Fett with unpainted hip pouch and Imperial Dignitary with unpainted right hand

[600][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][/600]
DSC's missing the red from the emblem (the Euro figure on the left turns up quite regularly missing the red bar)

Sometimes it's the little things

[600][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][/600]

The chance are that if you have a reasonably sized Star Wars collection, then you very well may have a a couple of factory errors that you have never even noticed before. The two figure above had been in my collection for years before I even noticed the tiny errors, tiny, but errors all the same.

[300][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][/300]
FX-7 missing the orange paint on the nipple thing and 4-LOM missing the tiny silver paint from the middle spot on his chin

Spray Mask Errors

Another form of paint error, is spray mask errors, these usually come in the form of scruffy looking overspray, when the mask has not been attached correctly, how ever sometimes this can produce interesting effects.

[600][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][/600]
Luke Bespins with saber hilt spray mask errors

The figure on the left has an interesting error. Typically spray masks are like clamps or tongs, where the part is placed into it a shaped plate on the end of the tongs with a cavity to fit the part in but with cut aways leaving the areas that need to be painted exposed. When the tongs are clamped together the part is held in place and then the paint is simply sprayed over using an air brush, the result is that once released from the tongs, only the exposed part will be painted. In the case of Luke's left leg, we definately know that there was two different masks used, one for the belt part, one for the saber, this can be seen in my first pic where the belt part is missing and the saber hilt is painted, I've also seen an MOC with this same error. a year or so ago on ebay in Australia I saw a Luke with the belt painted and the saber hilt unpainted which again shows the two different masks used, this figure would be in my collection now if it wasn't for a certain Aussie James forgetting to bid on it for me!!!!!! DAMN you AJ, you still owe me for that!  What a Face
This example must have had the part move before the clamp was closed so only half the saber got the paint. The other example is just a case of sloppy overspray.

[300][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][/300]

[300][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][/300]

This is an interesting spray issue, it's basically overspray, but in this example it actually adds a bit of character to the face in my opinion, kind of creates shadows down his nose and on his eye brows, giving him a more 3D and realistic look. Below is a comparison to how the average Snaggletooth looks. The Bossk on the other hand not so good, the PBP 'fat lips' looks like he's wearing lipstick, this one looks like he's wearing lipstick and applied it in the dark while pissed!  cheeky

[300][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][/300]

Short Shots/Pours

[600][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][/600]
Luke Bespin with short shot hand and short shot no COO markings

[300][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][/300]
Short shot hand and comparison to what it should look like

[600][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][/600]

If you look closely at the COO you can see the slightly raised area where the Hong Kong stamp was removed which shows that this was actually the No COO European Luke and it was just the 1980 L.F.L. that didn't get filled with plastic.

[400][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][/400]
Boba Fett with short shot right hand

[400][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][/400]
Comparison to normal hand, it's not much of a short shot in all fairness, but it does restrict him from holding a gun pretty much

Weapon Short Shots/Pours

[200][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][/200]
2 short shot Bespin sabers - Missing hilt guard on one side - Strange depressions on the blade and on the hilt

Casting Errors

Now it's important to note that short legs are NOT short pours. I have seen it said several times in this thread. A short shot or pour is the result of not enough plastic been injected into the mould, or in some cases, the plastic is restricted by a foreign body or dirt. When a leg or limb is too short this is the result of shrinkage. How this happens, I'm not entirely sure, but the general assumption is due to cooling to fast or been removed from the mould to quickly which has been mentioned already. The major difference is that these small limbs still have all the detail because the entire mould cavity was filled with plastic, but at some stage the limbs shrunk, so it is smaller but still complete, short shots are not complete, they are missing something. Essentially though it is still a kind of error, because it's most likely the result of a production error for example removing it from the mould to quickly if that is the cause. Another similar thing is the depression that can sometimes be found on the torso of figures, this is always in the place where the internal connecting rod and socket are within the torso, so most likely a sonic welding issue.

[300][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][/300]
Sort leg - Torso depression

The Potential Foul Play Suspects

[600][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][/600]

These guys I'm not entirely sure about, like I said earlier, there is a dark side to everything and so unfortunately some factory errors are certainly the result of fakes. The 4 figures here are not necessarily faked but I'm just not sure about them.

The DSC is missing it's entire chest emblem, now one thing that always stands out to me as dodgy is when an error is missing two things or has two errors on the one figure for example, both hands unpainted. thousands of figure where produced each day so it stands to reason that some are going to miss things, but for one figure to miss two things.... the odds become stacked. The DSC looks pretty clean but on a close inspection you can see a small mark on the chest in the place where the emblem was which could have been caused by it's removal.

[400][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][/400]

If you look at my other two DSC's which are missing the red, you can see that the blue is perfect, removing the red without damaging the blue would be damn near impossible.

[400][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][/400]

The Imperial Commander is missing the red from his emblem, Now the figure it's self is not in the best condition, so it could be wear, however there is now evidence of red anywhere even under the looking glass and the surface is not flat, so to remove the red and not effect the silver to much would be very difficult, especially as metallic paints are the easiest to damage. The chances are that this figure never had the red applied but it's hard to say because of the overall condition.

[400][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][/400]

The AT-AT commander is missing all the paint from the torso front, the problem here is that there was red and silver paint, so it managed to miss two different spray applications, like I said before, the odds are stacked against this so it automatically has the alarm bells ringing. The belt buckle has a tiny light spot in one of the grooves which is difficult to identify, even under the looking glass, could be a tiny flake of silver paint but also looks like a tiny nik in the plastic. The silver paint on the back torso on the clips at the top of the armour is still present. The details in the plastic where the paint should be would always make it difficult to remove so it's tough to say really, maybe it is, maybe it isn't, but the 'missing two' is a red flag for me.

[400][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][/400]

Finally the AT0AT Driver, he is missing his helmet emblems, these can be removed with ease of cause so it's difficult to say. The figure it's self is a bit of an anomolie it's self, unusually glossy black paint, lots of overspray, melt marks etc. an odd one, but again, so easy to fake it's difficult to say.

[400][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][/400]

It's worth mentioning that all the 4 figures above where not advertised as 'factory errors' with none of the faults pointed out, which does add a small amount of credibility to them, if you where going to fake somethingm then usually it would be for financial gain, so worth mentioning when selling.

And Finally.....

The non sonic welded figures Very Happy When the figures are assembled they 'snap' together via a rod and socket inside the body, this is quite a tight fit and will hold, so a figure could quite easily miss the sonic welding process and not flag up because it would stay together. The several MOC examples that exist with collapsed figures inside are testament to this.

[500][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][/500]

This Boba Fett was one such example of a figure that was not sonic welded, the seem around the torso is evidence of this as it is noticeably separated, how ever who ever grew up with this figure at some stage glued it together, this can be seen by the frosting under one of the arms, similar to that created by super glue.

[500][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][/500]

Thankfully, who ever glued this together never glued the rocket in so both the rocket and the internal rocket slot have zero melt marks due to the fact the weld was not done making this one of only a handful of Tri-Logo Fett's with a removable rocket on Earth Very Happy The original seller missed this too and it only cost me £40 What a Face  which is about £600 than the last one that I saw sell for cheeky

[600][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][/600]

gkhan
ourchickenshack
ourchickenshack
Dagobah Daimyo

Posts : 6928
Join date : 2015-02-21
Yavin Honor : 27918
Age : 53
Location : Oklahoma
Focus : Farceur Mollification

Back to top Go down

Short Pour & Factory Error Figures - Page 7 Empty Re: Short Pour & Factory Error Figures

Post by Dr Dengar Sat Nov 26, 2016 8:27 am


This is easily one of my favourite thread. cheers

I like the Cloud Car Pilot with unpainted goggles.
And welcome to the club Banton989. Great line up of factory Iggys you got there! Very Happy
Dr Dengar
Dr Dengar
Bespin Busho

Posts : 1906
Join date : 2015-02-19
Yavin Honor : 4514
Age : 52
Location : The Netherlands
Focus : Lili Ledy, PBP, MIB.

Back to top Go down

Short Pour & Factory Error Figures - Page 7 Empty Re: Short Pour & Factory Error Figures

Post by poncho Mon Nov 28, 2016 10:35 am

seeing the suspected foul play figures reminded me...

i gave a my loose DSC little clean a while back. it had some dust on it. as i wiped across his chest the the blue/red emblem stripes cameright off Shocked .....i was gutted
poncho
poncho
Sullust Samurai

Posts : 672
Join date : 2016-06-10
Yavin Honor : 1951

Back to top Go down

Short Pour & Factory Error Figures - Page 7 Empty Re: Short Pour & Factory Error Figures

Post by the89thchris Wed Dec 21, 2016 3:30 am

Very interesting. I'd love to have an example of any figure that wasn't sonic welded. Seems like a factory error that's pretty much impossible to fake.
the89thchris
the89thchris
Tatooine Taisho

Posts : 2326
Join date : 2016-11-12
Yavin Honor : 5170
Age : 35
Location : Toronto, Ontario
Focus : Complete loose Kenner figures & a few MOC's.

https://www.instagram.com/thechrisporteous/

Back to top Go down

Short Pour & Factory Error Figures - Page 7 Empty Re: Short Pour & Factory Error Figures

Post by ourchickenshack Thu Mar 23, 2017 8:02 am

Here's a few error figures I saw on while online shopping that I thought were pretty cool (but out of my price range  tongue )

[500][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][/500]
ourchickenshack
ourchickenshack
Dagobah Daimyo

Posts : 6928
Join date : 2015-02-21
Yavin Honor : 27918
Age : 53
Location : Oklahoma
Focus : Farceur Mollification

Back to top Go down

Short Pour & Factory Error Figures - Page 7 Empty Re: Short Pour & Factory Error Figures

Post by poncho Fri Nov 17, 2017 1:32 pm

recent purchase double post of image

short pour 4-lom no foot!

[500][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][/500]
poncho
poncho
Sullust Samurai

Posts : 672
Join date : 2016-06-10
Yavin Honor : 1951

Back to top Go down

Short Pour & Factory Error Figures - Page 7 Empty Re: Short Pour & Factory Error Figures

Post by Commander Clint Fri Nov 17, 2017 2:02 pm

Chris, that's a fantastic example. clapping
Commander Clint
Commander Clint
Jedi Shogun Spirit

Posts : 10522
Join date : 2015-02-23
Yavin Honor : 26785
Age : 54
Location : Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Focus : Canadian Items & cardbacks, loose variants

Back to top Go down

Short Pour & Factory Error Figures - Page 7 Empty Re: Short Pour & Factory Error Figures

Post by cantina_patron Fri Nov 17, 2017 6:59 pm

That's a very cool and unique error Chris!
cantina_patron
cantina_patron
Bespin Busho

Posts : 1964
Join date : 2015-02-21
Yavin Honor : 5600
Age : 52
Location : UK
Focus : Cardbacks, loose variants, Lili Ledy

Back to top Go down

Short Pour & Factory Error Figures - Page 7 Empty Re: Short Pour & Factory Error Figures

Post by Nico Sat Dec 02, 2017 12:21 pm

[400][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][/400]
Nico
Nico
Tatooine Taisho

Posts : 3559
Join date : 2015-11-27
Yavin Honor : 10144
Location : Wirral(UK)
Focus : Loose variants (Lando)

Back to top Go down

Short Pour & Factory Error Figures - Page 7 Empty Re: Short Pour & Factory Error Figures

Post by ChristianC Wed Dec 06, 2017 8:16 am

I was reading a discussion on FB the other day and Chris G mentioned that we should say 'short shot' rather than 'short pour,' as plastic is not poured. He said it's an industry expres​sion(he's an engineer). Not a big thing but I found it interesting...
ChristianC
ChristianC
Tatooine Taisho

Posts : 3102
Join date : 2015-02-24
Yavin Honor : 6843
Location : The Netherlands/Sydney
Focus : Luke Skywalker (all outfits) - MOC, loose variants and bootlegs

http://vintagestarwarscollectors.com

Back to top Go down

Page 7 of 7 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum